[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120523091954.GA8730@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:19:54 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>
CC: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Clock register in early init
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 07:37:15PM +0200, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Peter De Schrijver
> <pdeschrijver@...dia.com> wrote:
> >> We had at-least that on the older Samsung parts and they where still
> >> growing. I would suggest that in a multi-kernel image situation the
> >> more data that can be discarded after init-time the better.
> >>
> >> Also, __initdata gets gathered into one place so there's no possibility
> >> of page fragmentation there. If you mean fragmentation of the memory
> >> map, then allocate the size of all the clocks you know of at init time
> >> in one go.
> >>
> >
> > That would work, except that clocks are needed before kmalloc is available.
> >
>
> Is static initialization the only way to solve this problem? What
> about using the bootmem allocator for early init clocks?
>
If it can be handled inside the framework somehow. I would want to avoid
having several places where clocks inside the same SoC are initialized.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists