lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337775878.3013.16.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 13:24:38 +0100
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab+slob: dup name string

On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 16:08 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 03:46 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> We can't predict how slab will be extended in the future and this affects
> >> >  anything created before g_cpucache_cpu<= EARLY.  This would introduce the
> >> >  first problem with destroying such caches and is unnecessary if a
> >> >  workaround exists.
> > These problems seem to indicate that the slab behaviour: expecting the
> > string to exist for the lifetime of the cache so there's no need to copy
> > it might be better.
> >
> > This must be the behaviour all users of kmem_cache_create() expect
> > anyway, since all enterprise distributions use slab and they're not
> > getting bugs reported in this area.
> >
> > So, why not simply patch slab to rely on the string lifetime being the
> > cache lifetime (or beyond) and therefore not having it take a copy?
> >
> You mean patch slub? slub is the one that takes a copy currently.

Yes ... a one letter typo.  

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ