linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH V3 00/10] PM: Create the AVS(Adaptive Voltage Scaling)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMWX4cjzLYuPmA-k=Z_pc5uw=CCViPjRYqs4VTyLX6T8HhtcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 08:27:06 -0500
From:	"Menon, Nishanth" <nm@...com>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
Cc:	"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com>,
	"J, KEERTHY" <j-keerthy@...com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@...com>,
	"linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Pihet-XID, Jean" <j-pihet@...com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH V3 00/10] PM: Create the AVS(Adaptive Voltage Scaling)

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com> wrote:
> "Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@...com> writes:
>
>>> From: Hilman, Kevin
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:17 PM
>>
>>> A basic OMAP AVS driver has been in mainline for a long time, yet we
>>> have not seen support submitted for all of these features.
>>
>> 1.5/3.5 is a feature.
>
> And I'm still waiting for it to be submitted upstream.
>
>> ABB is requirement for a production useable driver. Higher speed rated
>> OMAP4 and all OMAP5 added these to be useable.
>
> ditto
>
>> Yes this is effort. Point of mentioning is to raise awareness of need.
>
> I'm well aware of the need.
>
>> Yet to be added feature has different meaning than functional gap.
>
> And both need to be submitted upstream.

SR 1.5: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129933897910785&w=2
ABB: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=130939399209099&w=2

I am not sure what you mean "need to be submitted upstream"?

Just tired of seeing things perpetually change without considering
even how to handle features that are mandatory for SoC even with code
posted upstream to show exactly what it takes.. I think you do mean
merged upstream in this context.


Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/