linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] Bluetooth: prevent double l2cap_chan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 10:39:34 +0900
From:	Minho Ban <mhban@...sung.com>
To:	Chanyeol Park <chanyeol.park@...sung.com>
Cc:	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Bluetooth: prevent double l2cap_chan_destroy

On 05/22/2012 09:23 PM, Chanyeol Park wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On 2012년 05월 22일 11:50, Minho Ban wrote:
>> @@ -1343,10 +1343,10 @@ static void l2cap_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err)
>>                  l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
>>
>>                  l2cap_chan_del(chan, err);
>> +               chan->ops->close(chan->data);
>>
>>                  l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
>>
>> -               chan->ops->close(chan->data);
>>                  l2cap_chan_put(chan);
>>          }
> I think this patch does not make sense Because inside chan->ops->close() "chan" could be freed in the l2cap_chan_destroy().
> 

I agree, thanks for pointing out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/