[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0C18FE92A7765D4EB9EE5D38D86A563A063C63@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 01:42:37 +0000
From: "Du, ChangbinX" <changbinx.du@...el.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
"'gregkh@...uxfoundation.org'" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: 'David Rientjes' <rientjes@...gle.com>,
'Sergei Shtylyov' <sshtylyov@...sta.com>,
"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"'balbi@...com'" <balbi@...com>, "'hpa@...or.com'" <hpa@...or.com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-usb@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] testusb: enable option "-l" in command line
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 03:40:28 -0700, Du, ChangbinX <changbinx.du@...el.com>
> wrote:
> > The "-l" option which makes test function loops forever, can be used for
> > usb stress test. But it is not usable yet, so enable it.
>
> This sentence is confusing (at least to me). How about something like:
>
> The testusb.c tool has support for looping forever implemented, which
> may be useful for stress test, yet it is not exposed to the user, so
> even though the code is there, it cannot be used. This commit adds
> ālā to the set of options handled by the application which enables
> the feature.
Yes, your description is much more appropriate. I will resend. Thanks.
Du Changibn.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists