linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/8] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: tpci200_slot_unmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120523142503.GM4629@mwanda>
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 17:25:03 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <siglesias@...lia.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200:
 tpci200_slot_unmap_space() should return 0 if succeed.

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 03:54:42PM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> tpci200_slot_unmap_space() should return 0 if the operation was properly done. If
> not, the caller will think that something wrong happened.
> 

It's weird and frustrating that gcc didn't warn that we used "res"
without initializing it.  It feels like the goto out_unlock places
should return an error.  But actually the callers don't don't check
the return values so I guess it doesn't matter.

All these patches look good.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/