[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120523142658.GD23600@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:26:58 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter@...ck-us.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
Hi Wim,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:44:30AM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> Since %04llx with a typecast to u64 is the way to go (Thanks Stephen and Randy)...
>
> > How do we make sure that Randy's patch makes it upstream ? The iTCO
> > patch is currently in Sam's tree.
>
> Can you carry Randy's patch/fix (since it fixes the change introduced by the iTCO_wdt mfd patch)?
> If not then I will apply the patch later on once the iTCO_wdt mfd patch is mainstream.
>
I'd appreciate if you could take it. I'm trying to avoid taking more patches
at this moment.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists