lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205231012330.30940@router.home>
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 10:17:02 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab+slob: dup name string

On Wed, 23 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:

> So if I understand it correctly, this is mostly because the name string
> outlives the cache in the slub case, because of merging ?

Well this means we really only need the copying in slub which we already
have.

The problem is that you want to make this behavior uniform over all
allocators so that you do not have to allocate the string on your own.

Could you wait (and not rely on copying) until I am through with the
extraction project for common code for the allocators? At that point we
can resolve this issue consistently for all allocators.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ