[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBRw_YALNuRfTOsmEqT7omtFJ1FLYVDip_nrdP=0qULCbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:21:11 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: zheng.z.yan@...el.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu,
andi@...stfloor.org, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] perf, tool: uncore related changes
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:53:13PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> Jiri,
>>
>> Is there a way with the current parser to have a syntax as follows:
>>
>> perf stat -e cpu/event=cycles,edge/ ...
>>
>> In other words, avoid juggling between -e cycles and the -e
>> cpu/event=.../ syntax?
>
Also with this new syntax, how am I supposed to request precise sampling?
perf stat -e cpu/event=cycles,edge,precise=1/
> I think it's possible.. so far we have the cpu/event=../ term in use for number
> assignment. We could do string translation to appropriate values.. I'll check
>
> added to my todo list ;)
>
> jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists