[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120523161932.GN14757@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 18:19:32 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <frank.arnold@....com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mce] x86/bitops: Move BIT_64() for a wider use
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:11:51AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 09:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:07 -0700, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> +#define BIT_64(n) (U64_C(1) << (n))
> >
> > Because writing 1ULL << n is too much work?
> >
>
> Because writing 1ULL << n is broken in anything that needs to be used in
> assembly, for example.
Actually we need a BIT() macro that works both
on 32- and 64-bit. But that won't be that easy:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1010.1/02335.html
And it should return UL for shift values < 32 and ULL otherwise.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists