[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120523174844.GA3373@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:48:44 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 10:07 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sasha Levin (1):
> >> x86, printk: Add missing KERN_CONT to NMI selftest
> >
> > Why? This seems to be garbage.
> >
>
> This was added to the urgent branch earlier (but it wasn't
> worth pushing late in rc) but apparently a more underlying bug
> was fixed in the meantime.
>
> It didn't seem worth removing since the KERN_CONT should
> really be there anyway.
I'm not sure it should be there: if there's no KERN_ prefix in a
printk, and the previous printk from this context did not end
with \n, then the KERN_CONT should be implicit.
KERN_CONT is really special, for rare cases where you want to
explicitly avoid the <> priority field or to construct it.
Or at least that's how I understand this area, it might have
been updated meanwhile - Linus?
Also, we can rebase the whole branch and get rid of this one and
of the merge commit it has.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists