[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120523181917.GN11775@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:19:17 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:58:06AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 12:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20120522:
>
>
>
> uml defconfig on x86_64:
>
> arch/um/kernel/process.c: In function 'interrupt_end':
> arch/um/kernel/process.c:122:14: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'replacement_session_keyring'
> arch/um/kernel/process.c:123:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'key_replace_session_keyring'
Grr... That's a conflict between uml gaining TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME (needed
prereq to task_work_add() series) and patch in said series doing away
with explicit calls of key_replace_session_keyring(). Fixup is to remove
those two lines in arch/um/process.c, same as done on other architectures
by "keys: kill the dummy key_replace_session_keyring()" (commit c1cb001).
Not an issue for mainline merge, since task_work_add patchset goes later,
but I think I'll have to cherry-pick that series into signal.git. And
probably reorder it a bit, moving the calls into tracehook_notify_resume()
first, with "kill the dummy..." commit removing just that single call.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists