[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8792C188-08C9-4575-97F6-CAC09A25A9AB@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 18:55:23 +0000
From: "Porter, Matt" <mporter@...com>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
CC: "<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"<linux@....linux.org.uk>" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"Dill, Russ" <russ.dill@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Unconditional call to smp_cross_call on UP crashes
On May 24, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> omap2plus_defconfig builds with SMP & SMP_ON_UP set.
> On beagle (which is UP) is_smp() returns false and we don't call
> smp_init_cpus which in turn does not initialize smp_cross_call which
> remains NULL.
>
> When issuing a reboot we OOPS with a NULL dereference on stop smp_call.
>
> Fixed by checking is_smp in smp_send_stop()
Please also add Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org in the sign offs
so it's picked up in stable.
Tested-by: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> index 8f46446..2a61335 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -588,6 +588,10 @@ void smp_send_stop(void)
> unsigned long timeout;
> struct cpumask mask;
>
> + /* make sure we don't bother if not SMP */
> + if (!is_smp())
> + return;
> +
> cpumask_copy(&mask, cpu_online_mask);
> cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
> smp_cross_call(&mask, IPI_CPU_STOP);
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists