[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVVtMwuXULhK3dHexdSex+7JSj=Vk9z8fWohfMvrOuCWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 22:51:26 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> uml defconfig on x86_64:
>>
>> arch/um/kernel/process.c: In function 'interrupt_end':
>> arch/um/kernel/process.c:122:14: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'replacement_session_keyring'
>> arch/um/kernel/process.c:123:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'key_replace_session_keyring'
>
> Grr... That's a conflict between uml gaining TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME (needed
> prereq to task_work_add() series) and patch in said series doing away
> with explicit calls of key_replace_session_keyring(). Fixup is to remove
> those two lines in arch/um/process.c, same as done on other architectures
> by "keys: kill the dummy key_replace_session_keyring()" (commit c1cb001).
JFYI, also on m68k:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/6353103/
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists