linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120523234730.GP11775@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2012 00:47:30 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:13:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 2)
> > 	Cherry-picked these guys into signal.git, along with the rest
> > of signal prereqs for them.  Merge with next/akpm-base yields a couple
> > of trivial conflicts in kernel/fork.c (with
> > 	sched, mm: Rework sched_{fork,exec} node assignment
> > removing INIT_LIST_HEAD right next to the place where we add one; conflict
> > resolution being just keep the one Oleg adds and remove the one Peter removes)
> > and in kernel/irq/manage.c (with
> > 	genirq: Be more informative on irq type mismatch
> > changing a couple of printks in there; conflict resolution: just remove
> > exit_irq_thread() in merged variant).  That's for-next-variant2.  With that
> > variant we get 5 more duplicates with next/akpm, obviously.
> > 
> > Stephen, which way would you prefer it handled?
> 
> So variant2 sits on top of variant1 and you are intending to push the
> work in variant2 in this merge window anyway?   In that case variant2
> makes sense.  The number of small conflicts don't matter to much (up to a
> point anyway :-)).  Also, these cherry-picks are out of Andrew's tree,
> right (so they are already in linuc-next)?  In which case I would
> probably go with variant2.

Fine by me...  Pushed into for-next, should be on git.kernel.org shortly...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/