[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4FBDD609.8060702@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:32:41 +0900
From: Minho Ban <mhban@...sung.com>
To: Chanyeol Park <chanyeol.park@...sung.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix null pointer dereference in l2cap_chan_send
On 05/22/2012 09:35 PM, Chanyeol Park wrote:
> Hi
> On 2012년 05월 21일 09:58, Minho Ban wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>> index 3bb1611..98d4541 100644
>> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>> @@ -727,10 +727,12 @@ static int l2cap_sock_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct ms
>> if (msg->msg_flags& MSG_OOB)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> - if (sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECTED)
>> + l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
>> + if (sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECTED || !chan->conn) {
>> + l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
>> return -ENOTCONN;
>> + }
>>
>> - l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
>> err = l2cap_chan_send(chan, msg, len, sk->sk_priority);
>> l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
>>
> Beside !chan->conn condition,I think it makes sense that sk_state check should be moved after l2cap_chan_lock()
> because sk_state could be changed due to l2cap_conn_del().
>
Thanks, chan->conn condition is not necessary, move sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECTED behind chan_lock is enough.
I'll amend this patch.
Regards
Minho Ban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists