[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337847472.15137.81.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:17:52 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heinz.Egger@...utronix.de, tim.bird@...sony.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] UBI: Implement Fastmap support
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 18:55 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> + e = find_early_wl_entry(&ubi->free, max_pnum);
> >
> > This picks the eb with the lowest pnum within 'ubi->free'.
> >
> > When called with INT_MAX (for the FM_DATA), why do you need to pick
> a
> > free eb with the minimal pnum? The FM_DATA EBs may reside everywhere
> (as
> > the FM_SB holds their location).
> > So why not pick the eb with a medium EC value (as done for standard
> > get_peb calls)? That might be better wear-leveling wise.
>
> Fair point.
> I'll fix that.
> Artem, any comments on that?
The 'find_early_wl_entry()' function is used (currently) only at early
stages. At these stages the we do not have the PEBs sorted by EC. We
have just a list. This function should not be use after the WL subsystem
is initialized.
>
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists