linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Make cycles:p working on SNB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sjeqq7i7.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2012 17:59:44 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Make cycles:p working on SNB

Hi, Stephane

On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:41:45 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 12:02 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>>> @@ -1329,6 +1329,12 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
>>>                */
>>>               u64 alt_config = X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .inv=1, .cmask=16);
>>>
>>> +             /*
>>> +              * SNB introduced INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for this purpose.
>>> +              */
>>> +             if (x86_pmu.pebs_constraints == intel_snb_pebs_event_constraints)
>>> +                     alt_config = X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01,
>>> +                                             .inv=1, .cmask=16);
>>>
>>>               alt_config |= (event->hw.config & ~X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK);
>>>               event->hw.config = alt_config;
>>
>> That's rather ugly.. but that's okay, I've actually got the patch for
>> this still laying around, it needs a bit of an update though.
>>
> You cannot simply use PREC_DIST. This umask has some severe
> restriction. When you measure it, NO other event on the the entire PMU
> can be measured at the same time. It needs exclusive mode on SNB.
>

Yeah, I read something like above on the SDM. But just got confused with
this:

$ ./perf stat -e cycles:p,instructions,cache-references,cache-misses noploop 1

 Performance counter stats for 'noploop 1':

     3,741,658,837 cycles                    #    0.000 GHz                    
     3,618,983,116 instructions              #    0.97  insns per cycle        
            51,126 cache-references                                            
             7,357 cache-misses              #   14.390 % of all cache refs    

       1.000692634 seconds time elapsed


Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/