lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 17:39:16 -0700
From:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To:	Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
	yehuda@...newdream.net, mpatocka@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
	bharrosh@...asas.com, tj@...nel.org, sage@...dream.net,
	agk@...hat.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 02/14] dm: kill dm_rq_bio_destructor

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:19:12AM +0900, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05/24/12 09:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > @@ -1438,15 +1439,6 @@ void dm_dispatch_request(struct request *rq)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_dispatch_request);
> >  
> > -static void dm_rq_bio_destructor(struct bio *bio)
> > -{
> > -	struct dm_rq_clone_bio_info *info = bio->bi_private;
> > -	struct mapped_device *md = info->tio->md;
> > -
> > -	free_bio_info(info);
> > -	bio_free(bio, md->bs);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int dm_rq_bio_constructor(struct bio *bio, struct bio *bio_orig,
> >  				 void *data)
> >  {
> > @@ -1461,7 +1453,6 @@ static int dm_rq_bio_constructor(struct bio *bio, struct bio *bio_orig,
> >  	info->tio = tio;
> >  	bio->bi_end_io = end_clone_bio;
> >  	bio->bi_private = info;
> > -	bio->bi_destructor = dm_rq_bio_destructor;
> 
> The destructor may also be called from blk_rq_unprep_clone(),
> which just puts bio.
> So this patch will introduce a memory leak.

Well, keeping around bi_destructor solely for that reason would be
pretty lousy. Can you come up with a better solution?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ