linux-kernel - Re: [rfc][patch] select_idle_sibling() inducing bouncing on westmere

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1337865641.9783.149.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2012 15:20:41 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] select_idle_sibling() inducing bouncing on
 westmere

On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 15:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> For power7 with 4 smt it would end up as 1230 I guess.

One more thing, in light of that, can't you simplify the core stuff to
be a simple shift as well? map them 123450, does it really matter to
pair them off like 103254 ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/