[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBE547A.5020900@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:32:10 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, acme@...hat.com
CC: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] perf, tool: Fix endianity trick for adds_features
bitmask
On 5/23/12 11:59 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 09:48:09AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 5/22/12 2:41 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>>> hm, any special details for the record? because I'm sure I tested this way..
>>>
>>> I'll retest, thanks
>>> jirka
>>
>>
>> The attached fixes it.
>
>> commit 1353676ca6551a0165df030784ada20ebea73f73
>> Author: David Ahern<dsahern@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue May 22 09:40:17 2012 -0600
>>
>> perf, tool: Fix endianity swapping for adds_features bitmask
>>
>> Based on Jiri's latest attempt:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/16/61
>>
>> Basically, adds_features should be byte swapped assuming unsigned
>> longs are either 8-bytes (u64) or 4-bytes (u32).
>>
>> Fixes 32-bit ppc dumping 64-bit x86 feature data:
>> ========
>> captured on: Sun May 20 19:23:23 2012
>> hostname : nxos-vdc-dev3
>> os release : 3.4.0-rc7+
>> perf version : 3.4.rc4.137.g978da3
>> arch : x86_64
>> nrcpus online : 16
>> nrcpus avail : 16
>> cpudesc : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5540 @ 2.53GHz
>> cpuid : GenuineIntel,6,26,5
>> total memory : 24680324 kB
>> ...
>>
>> Verified 64-bit x86 can still dump feature data for 32-bit ppc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern<dsahern@...il.com>
>
> I got the header properly displayed with this patch, but I'm getting
> following diffs in the perf report output (ppc32 vs x86_64):
> (after moving origin perf archive build-id cache to target system)
>
> - 0.00% perf [ext4] [k] 0x0005b318
> + 0.00% perf [ext4] [k] .cleanup_module
>
> - 0.00% yes [kernel.kallsyms] [k] .sys_write
> + 0.00% yes [kernel.kallsyms] [k] .SyS_write
>
> ^^^ this one is particularly disturbing ;)
>
> I guess it's unrelated to the header stuff which your patch fixes
> properly I think, but I got small conflict rebasing this to current tip
>
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa<jolsa@...hat.com>
That is odd... and if you are getting that much you are ahead of me.
When I analyze an x86_64 file on ppc32 all symbols show as
kernel.kallsyms dso.
The patch applies cleanly for me on latest acme/core:
$ patch -p1 < perf-swap-features.patch
patching file tools/perf/util/header.c
patching file tools/perf/util/include/linux/bitops.h
patching file tools/perf/util/session.c
patching file tools/perf/util/session.h
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists