[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120524185919.GE27550@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:59:19 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, bharrosh@...asas.com,
mpatocka@...hat.com, sage@...dream.net, yehuda@...newdream.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] block: Add bio_clone_kmalloc()
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 013c7a5..5a953c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
> }
>
> while (old_chain && (total < len)) {
> - tmp = bio_kmalloc(gfpmask, old_chain->bi_max_vecs);
> + tmp = bio_clone_kmalloc(old_chain, gfpmask);
> if (!tmp)
> goto err_out;
>
> @@ -751,13 +751,9 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
> if (!bp)
> goto err_out;
>
> - __bio_clone(tmp, &bp->bio1);
> -
> *next = &bp->bio2;
Is this code correct. Now original code might clone bio after split and
new code will clone the original bio itself and not the split one?
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists