linux-kernel - Re: tracing ring_buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1337891586.13348.202.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2012 16:33:06 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tracing ring_buffer_resize oops.

On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 16:18 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 16:05 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:24:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >  > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 15:11 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >  > 
> >  > >  > Also, how reproducible is it? When it triggered for me, it was constant.
> >  > >  > Every boot and test failed. But after I did the make mrproper, I have
> >  > >  > not been able to trigger it again. This is why I put it down as a bad
> >  > >  > build.
> >  > > 
> >  > > happens every time for me so far.
> >  > 
> >  > Did you also do a make mrproper and try again?
> > 
> > ok, that's nasty.  Works fine after a make clean.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for verifying. I'm thinking this is a build bug. Something's not
> cleaning up properly. It may be with the recordmcount code. Perhaps
> objects needed to change where the mcount calls are and did not?
> 
> I'll try other things to see if I can trigger this again. Then I'll save
> off the build tree, do a make clean, rebuild, and compare what's
> different.
> 

I'm kicking off the ktest that initially caused this issue hoping that
it reproduces the bad tree again.

BTW, did you happen to upgrade gcc or anything? The ktest I run does
test against different gcc's and I don't think I had it do a make clean
between the switch. That may be the cause of this problem too :-?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/