linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] KVM updates for Linux 3.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzWb4Sm2jNStvaORVCGd0AQ_inVwxu+9D9uWNpsOMd_Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2012 16:23:51 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM updates for Linux 3.5

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> Linus, please pull the KVM updates for the 3.5 cycle from

Ok. The way I resolved a the x86 kvm_para.h conflict, I suspect it is
now being *unnecessarily* careful about doing the CPUID thing, and I
think that the "cpuid_level < 0" check that came in through the x86
tree can be removed in favor of the KVM one.

But I left both checks in as the obvious non-semantic resolution, and
if you guys decide that it's redundant, you can remove it later.

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/