[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k400i9y1.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:58:46 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] vfs: atomic open v4 (part 1)
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> writes:
> I've been looking at your patches when they're all applied, and I suspect
> you're missing some security calls.
>
> For instance, in lookup_open(), you call security_path_mknod() prior to
> calling vfs_create(), but you don't call it prior to calling atomic_open() or
> in, say, nfs_atomic_open().
We call security_path_mknod() before ->atomic_open() in may_o_create().
> You do need to, however, though I can see it's
> difficult to work out where. Is it possible to call it if O_CREAT is
> specified and d_inode is NULL right before calling atomic_open()?
>
> I'm also wondering if you're missing an audit_inode() call in the if (created)
> path after the retry_lookup label.
There's no audit_inode() on the created dentry neither in the original
code nor in the modified code.
But that may be a bug regardless, it's just independent of my changes.
At least AFAICS.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists