linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86-64: use EFI to deal with platform wall clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120525152414.GA16704@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Fri, 25 May 2012 16:24:14 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: use EFI to deal with platform wall clock

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 04:20:31PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:

> Also make the two EFI functions in question here static - they're not
> being referenced elsewhere.

Looks good, but should we also be changing get_time to return in UTC? 
What are the expected semantics for get_wallclock?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/