[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBbJgAMU1rhLxUjCf+T_yNBZ=aif=95gnCpmGr8Coh4bCnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:26:39 -0700
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
cmetcalf@...era.com, sivanich@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, greg.pearson@...com, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru,
tglx@...utronix.de, rth@...ddle.net,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, anton@...ba.org,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, davem@...emloft.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, mattst88@...il.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Rewrite the CONFIG_NUMA sched domain support
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>> That said, I can only find the 1 alloc_node() in sched_init_numa()
Just to complete the loop - your patch is good ... it isn't necessary to
also change another random kzalloc_node() in an unrelated function
that just happens to be where "n" in vi jumps to :-)
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists