[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337979086.13348.269.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:51:26 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: BUG - function tracing with breakpoints
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:46 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 10:40 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 05/25/2012 08:29 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > This would make sense for this bug, as if modifying_ftrace_code was not
> > > seen by other CPUs, it wouldn't go into the ftrace_int3_handler() path.
> > > That would cause this issue. But the bug remains after the smp_mb()'s
> > > were put in place. Although it behaves a little differently not. Maybe
> > > there's something else I missed?
> > >
> >
> > Perhaps you should make the modifying_ftrace_code modification atomic...
> > it seems odd to have it not be atomic when it is clearly accessed across
> > CPUs that way.
>
> I guess I can make it atomic. Not really a big deal as this (and soon
> one other place) is the only place that changes its value.
>
> I've found another place that may be causing harm, and I'm currently
> working on fixing it. Hopefully after that's done, this problem will go
> away.
Grumble, still faults, and the notifier that I was tracking down
happened to be for DIE_OOPS :-p
/me continues his search.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists