[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBFF1F0.6050802@tilera.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:56:16 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] timer: make __next_timer_interrupt explicit about
no future event
On 5/25/2012 4:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> I've noticed a similar but slightly different fix to the
>> > same problem in the Tilera kernel tree from Chris M. (I've
>> > wrote this before seeing that one), so some variation of this
>> > fix is in use on real hardware for some time now.
> Sigh, why can't people post their fixes instead of burying them in
> their private trees?
The tree was never really ready for review. I pushed the tree just for
reference to the nohz cpusets work, and so that I have something I can
refer people to when I start participating more actively in that discussion.
It didn't seem useful to post a single patch by itself without more
motivating examples behind it (i.e. without the entirety of the tree).
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists