[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC0009C.5000704@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:58:52 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Newbury <steve@...wbury.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] PCI: Try to allocate mem64 above 4G at first
On 05/25/2012 02:55 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> I think we actually have a separate bug here. On 64-bit non-x86
> architectures, PCIBIOS_MAX_MEM_32 is a 64-bit -1, so the following
> attempt to avoid putting a 32-bit BAR above 4G only works on x86,
> where PCIBIOS_MAX_MEM_32 is 0xffffffff.
>
> /* don't allocate too high if the pref mem doesn't support 64bit*/
> if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64))
> max = PCIBIOS_MAX_MEM_32;
>
> I think we should fix this with a separate patch that removes
> PCIBIOS_MAX_MEM_32 altogether, replacing this use with an explicit
> 0xffffffff (or some other "max 32-bit value" symbol). I don't think
> there's anything arch-specific about this.
>
> So I'd like to see two patches here:
> 1) Avoid allocating 64-bit regions for 32-bit BARs
> 2) Try to allocate regions above 4GB for 64-bit BARs
>
Do we also need to track the maximum address available to the CPU?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists