[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC0063E.8080209@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:22:54 -0700
From: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: compute a more reasonable default ip6_rt_max_size
On 5/25/12 1:47 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 13:15 -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
>> The algorithm is based on ipv4 and alloc_large_system_hash().
>>
>
> Why is it needed at all ?
>
> IPv4 has a route cache with potentially millions of entries, not IPv6.
With the default size of 4096 for the ipv6 routing table, entries can
get garbage collected and hosts could lose their default route and
therefore lose connectivity.
We actually saw it happen.
-Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists