lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 26 May 2012 00:12:33 +0100
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de,
	drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, bharrosh@...asas.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
	mpatocka@...hat.com, sage@...dream.net, yehuda@...newdream.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/16] Make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily
	large bios

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:58:52PM +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> I think a body of *empirical* evidence should provide the justification
> for this particular change, and until such evidence is forthcoming we
> should keep the status quo.
 
What I'm trying to say is, by all means, let's continue to clean up this
patch set, but then give it some serious performance testing under
different regimes, compare it against the status quo, do whatever
tuning seems appropriate then let the results guide us.

Alasdair

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists