[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC02777.5070003@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:44:39 -0700
From: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: compute a more reasonable default ip6_rt_max_size
On 5/25/12 5:11 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> These were not admin configured routes. They were discovered via ipv6
>> neighbor discovery.
>
> Then such default routes should either be:
>
> 1) Passed over by GC
>
> 2) Trigger neighbour discovery when GC'd
It's possible that there is a bug somewhere - we didn't get a chance to
dig deeper. What we observed is that as we got close to the 4096 limit,
some hosts were becoming unreachable. A modest increase in the routing
table size made things better.
-Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists