[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338041744.2525.46.camel@koala>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 17:15:44 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Heinz.Egger@...utronix.de,
tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing)
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 16:01 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > We can start with the UBI tests from the mtd-utils plust the integck
> > test. And whatever goes to my branch should never break them. Do these
> > tests pass now? If not, let's make them pass.
> >
>
> What is "integck" test?
It is a quite extensive FS check which we use for UBIFS. As UBIFS is the
main UBI client - it makes sense to run it. It lives in the
mtd-utils.git/tests/fs/integck
./integck -n8 /mnt/ubifs
would run in. /mnt/ubifs is the ubifs mount-point. -n8 means repeat 8
times.
> UBI tests from mtd-utils pass now.
> The io_paral triggered a race condition on my very fast qemu-kvm test system.
> On my test board with real NAND flash this race never happened.
> Anyway, it's fixed now.
Cool!
> I'm mostly testing with custom scripts, shall I send a patch against UBI tests?
Yes, it would be great to integrate this, of course. I might also want
to send you a patch, then I'd run it.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists