lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC09A6D.4060602@nod.at>
Date:	Sat, 26 May 2012 10:55:09 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/20] arm: Do not call try_to_freeze() in do_signal()

Am 26.05.2012 01:43, schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:04:29AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> get_signal_to_deliver() already calls try_to_freeze(), there is no
>> need to call it directly.
> 
> NAK.  Please check linux-next (okay, viro's patches haven't appeared
> there yet) but a lot of this stuff is covered by a truckload of work
> that Al's done.
> 

Okay.
I've rebased my patches to Al's signal tree to avoid further conflicts.

Thanks,
//richard


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ