lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 26 May 2012 12:18:21 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <>
To:	Suresh Siddha <>
cc:	Dimitri Sivanich <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>,,
	Yinghai Lu <>,
	Naga Chumbalkar <>,
	Jacob Pan <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: check for valid irq_cfg pointer in

On Fri, 25 May 2012, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 21:16 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> There are other (not-so common) irq desc references, like in the
> show_interrupts() (cat /proc/interrupts path) etc, that does things like
> this in the process context:
>         desc = irq_to_desc(i);
>         if (!desc)
>                 return 0;
>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> May be we should introduce something like
> get_irq_desc_locked()/put_irq_desc_locked() that can safely access the
> irq desc with pre-emption/irq's disabled and lock it etc. And the
> synchronize_sched() will enable the destroy_irq()/free_desc() to free it
> safely etc.

I want to avoid that and instead use proper refcounting. The reason is
that we want to move the irq descriptor when the affinity changes
nodes, and for that we need refcounting anyway.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists