linux-kernel - Re: Regression Mounting /proc w/ kernel 3.4.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy7tji1bU8rT2CC2nc9wfqk_5S8R53Js2=e6k1soGSFtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 May 2012 17:30:34 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	kd6lvw@...oo.com
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
	Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression Mounting /proc w/ kernel 3.4.0 - "uid" parameter no
 longer ignored.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM,  <kd6lvw@...oo.com> wrote:
>
> I personally don't care if the option is restored or not.  My issue was that this side effect was not documented in any way in the change that occurred -- which affected documented behavior.

Umm. The side effect wasn't documented, because nobody even *thought* of it.

If people had thought of it, it wouldn't have happened. So harping
about documentation is kind of pointless.

The real question is whether there might be some other option
(documented or not) that people might have used and just accidentally
relied on the fact that /proc never even bothered to look at them.

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/