linux-kernel - [ 82/94] x86/mce: Fix check for processor context when machine check was taken.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 May 2012 10:05:45 +0900
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: [ 82/94] x86/mce: Fix check for processor context when machine check was taken.

3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>

commit 875e26648cf9b6db9d8dc07b7959d7c61fb3f49c upstream.

Linus pointed out that there was no value is checking whether m->ip
was zero - because zero is a legimate value.  If we have a reliable
(or faked in the VM86 case) "m->cs" we can use it to tell whether we
were in user mode or kernelwhen the machine check hit.

Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c |   16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
@@ -145,15 +145,19 @@ static struct severity {
 };
 
 /*
- * If the EIPV bit is set, it means the saved IP is the
- * instruction which caused the MCE.
+ * If mcgstatus indicated that ip/cs on the stack were
+ * no good, then "m->cs" will be zero and we will have
+ * to assume the worst case (IN_KERNEL) as we actually
+ * have no idea what we were executing when the machine
+ * check hit.
+ * If we do have a good "m->cs" (or a faked one in the
+ * case we were executing in VM86 mode) we can use it to
+ * distinguish an exception taken in user from from one
+ * taken in the kernel.
  */
 static int error_context(struct mce *m)
 {
-	if (m->mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_EIPV)
-		return (m->ip && (m->cs & 3) == 3) ? IN_USER : IN_KERNEL;
-	/* Unknown, assume kernel */
-	return IN_KERNEL;
+	return ((m->cs & 3) == 3) ? IN_USER : IN_KERNEL;
 }
 
 int mce_severity(struct mce *m, int tolerant, char **msg)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/