[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120528031203.986470805@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 04:12:10 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [ 008/117] bio: dont overflow in bio_get_nr_vecs()
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
commit 5abebfdd02450fa1349daacf242e70b3736581e3 upstream.
There were two places bio_get_nr_vecs() could overflow:
First, it did a left shift to convert from sectors to bytes immediately
before dividing by PAGE_SIZE. If PAGE_SIZE ever was less than 512 a great
many things would break, so dividing by PAGE_SIZE >> 9 is safe and will
generate smaller code too.
The nastier overflow was in the DIV_ROUND_UP() (that's what the code was
effectively doing, anyways). If n + d overflowed, the whole thing would
return 0 which breaks things rather effectively.
bio_get_nr_vecs() doesn't claim to give an exact value anyways, so the
DIV_ROUND_UP() is silly; we could do a straight divide except if a
device's queue_max_sectors was less than PAGE_SIZE we'd return 0. So we
just add 1; this should always be safe - things will break badly if
bio_get_nr_vecs() returns > BIO_MAX_PAGES (bio_alloc() will suddenly start
failing) but it's queue_max_segments that must guard against this, if
queue_max_sectors is preventing this from happen things are going to
explode on architectures with different PAGE_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/bio.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
index b1fe82c..b980ecd 100644
--- a/fs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/bio.c
@@ -505,13 +505,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone);
int bio_get_nr_vecs(struct block_device *bdev)
{
struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
- int nr_pages;
-
- nr_pages = ((queue_max_sectors(q) << 9) + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (nr_pages > queue_max_segments(q))
- nr_pages = queue_max_segments(q);
-
- return nr_pages;
+ return min_t(unsigned,
+ queue_max_segments(q),
+ queue_max_sectors(q) / (PAGE_SIZE >> 9) + 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_get_nr_vecs);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists