[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120528031203.152711779@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 04:12:04 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [ 002/117] KVM: Ensure all vcpus are consistent with in-kernel irqchip settings
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3e515705a1f46beb1c942bb8043c16f8ac7b1e9e)
If some vcpus are created before KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP, then
irqchip_in_kernel() and vcpu->arch.apic will be inconsistent, leading
to potential NULL pointer dereferences.
Fix by:
- ensuring that no vcpus are installed when KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP is called
- ensuring that a vcpu has an apic if it is installed after KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP
This is somewhat long winded because vcpu->arch.apic is created without
kvm->lock held.
Based on earlier patch by Michael Ellerman.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c | 5 +++++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++++
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
index 43f4c92..7073185 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c
@@ -1169,6 +1169,11 @@ out:
#define PALE_RESET_ENTRY 0x80000000ffffffb0UL
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kcm) == (vcpu->arch.apic != NULL);
+}
+
int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *v;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index e04cae1..4fc5323 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3579,6 +3579,9 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
r = -EEXIST;
if (kvm->arch.vpic)
goto create_irqchip_unlock;
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
+ goto create_irqchip_unlock;
r = -ENOMEM;
vpic = kvm_create_pic(kvm);
if (vpic) {
@@ -6486,6 +6489,11 @@ void kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *rtn)
kvm_x86_ops->check_processor_compatibility(rtn);
}
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) == (vcpu->arch.apic != NULL);
+}
+
int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct page *page;
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 35410ef..6136821 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -744,6 +744,13 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_is_bsp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return vcpu->kvm->bsp_vcpu_id == vcpu->vcpu_id;
}
+
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+#else
+
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return true; }
+
#endif
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 9ffac2e..ec747dc 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1667,6 +1667,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
goto vcpu_destroy;
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ if (!kvm_vcpu_compatible(vcpu)) {
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
+ }
if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) == KVM_MAX_VCPUS) {
r = -EINVAL;
goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists