[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC349B7.2090101@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 17:47:35 +0800
From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tony.luck@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: mce: Implement cmci poll mode for intel machines
δΊ 2012/5/25 14:24, Borislav Petkov ει:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:54:52PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Intentionally left blank to be filled out by someone who wants
>> that and can explain the reason for this better than me.
>
> That'll be Intel folk :)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Looks good to me too, thanks Thomas for doing this!
>
> I'll run it next week just in case.
>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
>
Hi, Boris
Have you tested Thomas' patch. During my test, it hangs in below 2
scenarios:
1) remove sb_edac driver, and then inject error, hang right now!
2) keep sb_edac drivr, inject error until storm happens (I changed
the condition from 1 HZ to 1 minute to make it easy to trigger
storm), after 5 errors are injected, codes enter *storm* mode,
but hang right now again!
At least, scenario 2 has direct connection with new patches. I
need time to investigate because no any output after hang. (lockdep?)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists