linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FC373D9.7040109@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2012 18:17:21 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
CC:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions

On 05/28/2012 02:32 PM, Alex Shi wrote:

> Current few cpumask function purpose are not quite clear. Stupid
> user like myself need to dig into details for clear function
> purpose and return value.


You can just see how it is used elsewhere and figure it out ;-)
Anyway, in principle, I don't have any objections to adding comments
that are actually helpful. But I don't think all the comments this
patch adds fall into that category..

> Add few explanation for them is helpful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpumask.h |    6 ++++++
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index a2c819d..8436e61 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *dstp)
>   * cpumask_test_cpu - test for a cpu in a cpumask
>   * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
>   * @cpumask: the cpumask pointer
> + * return 1 if the 'cpu' is in the old 'cpumask', otherwise return 0
>   *


s/return/Returns

What do you mean by "old" cpumask?

>   * No static inline type checking - see Subtlety (1) above.
>   */
> @@ -281,6 +282,7 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *dstp)
>   * cpumask_test_and_set_cpu - atomically test and set a cpu in a cpumask
>   * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
>   * @cpumask: the cpumask pointer
> + * return 1 if the 'cpu' is in the old 'cpumask', otherwise return 0
>   *


"Test and Set" already has a very well-defined and well-known meaning.. Not sure if the
comment adds any extra value..

>   * test_and_set_bit wrapper for cpumasks.
>   */
> @@ -293,6 +295,7 @@ static inline int cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *cpumask)
>   * cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu - atomically test and clear a cpu in a cpumask
>   * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
>   * @cpumask: the cpumask pointer
> + * return 1 if the 'cpu' is in the old 'cpumask', otherwise return 0
>   *


Same here. Pretty well known meaning.

>   * test_and_clear_bit wrapper for cpumasks.
>   */
> @@ -324,6 +327,7 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear(struct cpumask *dstp)
>   * @dstp: the cpumask result
>   * @src1p: the first input
>   * @src2p: the second input
> + * if *dstp is empty, return 0, otherwise return 1


I don't think anybody would be interested in the return value of this function!
The functionality (rather than the return value) is what is more interesting
and useful, and is already well-documented.

>   */
>  static inline int cpumask_and(struct cpumask *dstp,
>  			       const struct cpumask *src1p,
> @@ -365,6 +369,7 @@ static inline void cpumask_xor(struct cpumask *dstp,
>   * @dstp: the cpumask result
>   * @src1p: the first input
>   * @src2p: the second input
> + * if *dstp is empty, return 0, otherwise return 1


Same here. Functionality is more interesting.

>   */
>  static inline int cpumask_andnot(struct cpumask *dstp,
>  				  const struct cpumask *src1p,
> @@ -414,6 +419,7 @@ static inline bool cpumask_intersects(const struct cpumask *src1p,
>   * cpumask_subset - (*src1p & ~*src2p) == 0
>   * @src1p: the first input
>   * @src2p: the second input
> + * return 1 if the *src1p is the subset of *src2p, otherwise return 0


s/return/Returns
(I think the function name itself is pretty descriptive, but anyway...)

>   */
>  static inline int cpumask_subset(const struct cpumask *src1p,
>  				 const struct cpumask *src2p)


 
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/