| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:17:58 +0200 From: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> CC: alan@...ux.intel.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arnd@...db.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/of-serial: Add 16654 chip to compatible string list On 28/05/12 20:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> Now, introducing a new type, can I add to 8250.c's uart_config[] by >> introducing a new type (no. 22) after PORT_XR17D15X? Unfortunately, >> there are the "ARM specific type numbers" after current PORT_MAX_8250 >> (21), but those are not listed in 8250.c's uart_config[]. Or how am I >> supposed to add a new type? > > If it's 8250, stick it in with the group, otherwise the array will > become stupidly large. That's why there's a separation of the two. Do you mean adding one element to uart_config[] and increasing PORT_MAX_8250 (actually, the size of uart_config[]) by one? I would also need to increase the indices of all the following "ARM specific type numbers" by one (the second group). Or did I get sth. wrong here? Thanks in advance, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists