[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120528031213.914065091@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 04:13:22 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [ 080/117] ext4: fix error handling on inode bitmap corruption
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
commit acd6ad83517639e8f09a8c5525b1dccd81cd2a10 upstream.
When insert_inode_locked() fails in ext4_new_inode() it most likely means inode
bitmap got corrupted and we allocated again inode which is already in use. Also
doing unlock_new_inode() during error recovery is wrong since the inode does
not have I_NEW set. Fix the problem by jumping to fail: (instead of fail_drop:)
which declares filesystem error and does not call unlock_new_inode().
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
index 00beb4f..8fb6844 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -885,8 +885,12 @@ got:
if (IS_DIRSYNC(inode))
ext4_handle_sync(handle);
if (insert_inode_locked(inode) < 0) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto fail_drop;
+ /*
+ * Likely a bitmap corruption causing inode to be allocated
+ * twice.
+ */
+ err = -EIO;
+ goto fail;
}
spin_lock(&sbi->s_next_gen_lock);
inode->i_generation = sbi->s_next_generation++;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists