[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120528011522.GA9891@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 10:15:22 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, bharrosh@...asas.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
mpatocka@...hat.com, sage@...dream.net, yehuda@...newdream.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] block: Generalized bio pool freeing
Hello, Kent.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 01:25:24PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> With the old code, when you allocate a bio from a bio pool you have to
> implement your own destructor that knows how to find the bio pool the
> bio was originally allocated from.
>
> This adds a new field to struct bio (bi_pool) and changes
> bio_alloc_bioset() to use it. This makes various bio destructors
> unnecessary, so they're then deleted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
> Change-Id: I5eb66c1d6910757f4af8755b8857dcbe4619cf8d
In the previous review, I made two requests about this patch.
* Please improve description.
* Please lose Change-Id.
None of which seems to have happened and my Acked-by isn't added
either. Come on. Give me some reason to keep reviewing this stuff.
A couple more suggestions.
* If this goes in, it will go through Jens' block tree. Better keep
him cc'd.
* It's generally a good idea to have Cc: tags in the description
footer for the maintainers of the affected subsystems.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists