linux-kernel - [ 078/117] compat: Fix RT signal mask corruption via sigprocmask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 May 2012 04:13:20 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Subject: [ 078/117] compat: Fix RT signal mask corruption via sigprocmask

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>

commit b7dafa0ef3145c31d7753be0a08b3cbda51f0209 upstream.

compat_sys_sigprocmask reads a smaller signal mask from userspace than
sigprogmask accepts for setting.  So the high word of blocked.sig[0]
will be cleared, releasing any potentially blocked RT signal.

This was discovered via userspace code that relies on get/setcontext.
glibc's i386 versions of those functions use sigprogmask instead of
rt_sigprogmask to save/restore signal mask and caused RT signal
unblocking this way.

As suggested by Linus, this replaces the sys_sigprocmask based compat
version with one that open-codes the required logic, including the merge
of the existing blocked set with the new one provided on SIG_SETMASK.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 kernel/compat.c |   63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/compat.c b/kernel/compat.c
index 74ff849..d2c67aa 100644
--- a/kernel/compat.c
+++ b/kernel/compat.c
@@ -372,25 +372,54 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_sigpending(compat_old_sigset_t __user *set)
 
 #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SIGPROCMASK
 
-asmlinkage long compat_sys_sigprocmask(int how, compat_old_sigset_t __user *set,
-		compat_old_sigset_t __user *oset)
+/*
+ * sys_sigprocmask SIG_SETMASK sets the first (compat) word of the
+ * blocked set of signals to the supplied signal set
+ */
+static inline void compat_sig_setmask(sigset_t *blocked, compat_sigset_word set)
 {
-	old_sigset_t s;
-	long ret;
-	mm_segment_t old_fs;
+	memcpy(blocked->sig, &set, sizeof(set));
+}
 
-	if (set && get_user(s, set))
-		return -EFAULT;
-	old_fs = get_fs();
-	set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
-	ret = sys_sigprocmask(how,
-			      set ? (old_sigset_t __user *) &s : NULL,
-			      oset ? (old_sigset_t __user *) &s : NULL);
-	set_fs(old_fs);
-	if (ret == 0)
-		if (oset)
-			ret = put_user(s, oset);
-	return ret;
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_sigprocmask(int how,
+				       compat_old_sigset_t __user *nset,
+				       compat_old_sigset_t __user *oset)
+{
+	old_sigset_t old_set, new_set;
+	sigset_t new_blocked;
+
+	old_set = current->blocked.sig[0];
+
+	if (nset) {
+		if (get_user(new_set, nset))
+			return -EFAULT;
+		new_set &= ~(sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP));
+
+		new_blocked = current->blocked;
+
+		switch (how) {
+		case SIG_BLOCK:
+			sigaddsetmask(&new_blocked, new_set);
+			break;
+		case SIG_UNBLOCK:
+			sigdelsetmask(&new_blocked, new_set);
+			break;
+		case SIG_SETMASK:
+			compat_sig_setmask(&new_blocked, new_set);
+			break;
+		default:
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		set_current_blocked(&new_blocked);
+	}
+
+	if (oset) {
+		if (put_user(old_set, oset))
+			return -EFAULT;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 #endif


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/