[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120529125452.GB23991@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:54:52 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Convert BDI proportion calculations to
flexible proportions
On Tue 29-05-12 14:38:31, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 14:34 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> > The only safe solution seems to be to create a variant of percpu counters
> > that can be used from an interrupt. Or do you have other idea Peter?
>
> > > [ 20.680186] [<ffffffff8325ac9b>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3b/0x70
> > > [ 20.680186] [<ffffffff81993527>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0x17/0xc0
> > > [ 20.680186] [<ffffffff81993527>] __percpu_counter_sum+0x17/0xc0
> > > [ 20.680186] [<ffffffff810ebf90>] ? init_timer_deferrable_key+0x20/0x20
> > > [ 20.680186] [<ffffffff8195b5c2>] fprop_new_period+0x12/0x60
> > > [ 20.680186] [<ffffffff811d929d>] writeout_period+0x3d/0xa0
> > > [ 20.680186] [<ffffffff810ec0bf>] call_timer_fn+0x12f/0x260
> > > [ 20.680186] [<ffffffff810ebf90>] ? init_timer_deferrable_key+0x20/0x20
>
> Yeah, just make sure IRQs are disabled around doing that ;-)
Evil ;) But we'd need to have IRQs disabled also in each
fprop_fraction_percpu() call, and generally, if we want things clean, we'd
need to disable them in all entry points to proportion code (or at least
around all percpu calls)...
Honza
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists