[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC544FE.3000204@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:51:58 -0700
From: Michael Reed <mdr@....com>
To: Karandeep Chahal <kchahal@....com>
CC: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dillowda@...l.gov, roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ib_srp: Infiniband srp fast failover patch.
Did you subsequently reconnect the target and confirm appropriate behavior?
On 05/29/2012 02:07 PM, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] Infiniband srp fast failover patch. Currently ib_srp does
> not do anything on receiving a DREQ from the target, it
> only sends a response back. Further it also does not
> monitor port (down) events. I have patched srp to remove
> scsi devices when a port down event is received or if the
> target sends a DREQ. Currently even though the target
> notifies the initiator of its intentions of going away, the
> initiator ignores that information. Later the initiator
> gets upset when the devices "suddenly" disappear resulting
> in srp initiating an error recovery process which takes a
> long time. This caused high failover latencies as compared
> to fibre channel. In my experiments with RHEL 6.0 and 6.2 I
> encountered failover time that exceeded 2 minutes and 20
> seconds (despite tweaking /etc/multipath.conf and
> /sys/block/<>/timeout). With this patch the failover takes
> 30 seconds. I have tested this patch with and without a
> switch.
>
> Yours, etc.
> Karan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists