[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC5B682.4010509@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:18 -0700
From: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/6] time: keep track of the pending utc/tai threshold
On 05/29/2012 10:11 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 06:49:30PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> index 6e46cac..81c76a9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> @@ -962,6 +962,7 @@ static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(cycle_t offset, int shift)
>> timekeeper.xtime.tv_sec++;
>> leap = second_overflow(timekeeper.xtime.tv_sec);
>> timekeeper.xtime.tv_sec += leap;
>> + timekeeper.wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec -= leap;
> Don't you need this in update_wall_time() too?
Yep. Good point.
> BTW I suggest refactoring this code (two almost identical if{} bodies)
> into a shared helper function.
>
Sounds good, although since the logic is ever so slightly different I
might split up the pure fix and do the refactoring later so the fix is
easier to apply to -stable branches.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists