[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <019401cd3e34$0c6af4d0$2540de70$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:15:53 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: 'KOSAKI Motohiro' <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
'Russell King - ARM Linux' <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
'Chunsang Jeong' <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>,
'Krishna Reddy' <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
'Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk' <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
'Hiroshi Doyu' <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
'Subash Patel' <subashrp@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 4/4] ARM: dma-mapping: remove custom consistent dma region
Hello,
On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:11 AM KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > static void *
> > __dma_alloc_remap(struct page *page, size_t size, gfp_t gfp, pgprot_t prot,
> > const void *caller)
> > {
> > - struct arm_vmregion *c;
> > - size_t align;
> > - int bit;
> > + struct vm_struct *area;
> > + unsigned long addr;
> >
> > - if (!consistent_pte) {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: not initialised\n", __func__);
> > + area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_DMA | VM_USERMAP, caller);
>
> In this patch, VM_DMA is only used here. So, is this no effect?
I introduced it mainly to let user know which areas have been allocated by the dma-mapping api.
I also plan to add a check suggested by Minchan Kim in __dma_free_remap() if the vmalloc area
have been in fact allocated with VM_DMA set.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists